Oops, wrong attachment. Here is the correct attachment. The pcb file
has the errant element, see line 44.
The scm files are different. Please see second attachment.
On 05/22/2018 06:28 PM, Roland Lutz wrote:
>> Sure, please see attached.
> Which is which?
>
>> It might be of interest that gsch2pcb from the fedora repository did
> not fail in this way, even though it shows the same version number.
>
> This is weird. Are the gnet-gsch2pcb.scm files identical?
>
Oops, wrong attachment. Here is the correct attachment. The pcb file
has the errant element, see line 44.
The scm files are different. Please see second attachment.
On 05/22/2018 06:28 PM, Roland Lutz wrote:
>> Sure, please see attached.
> Which is which?
>
>> It might be of interest that gsch2pcb from the fedora repository did
> not fail in this way, even though it shows the same version number.
>
> This is weird. Are the gnet-gsch2pcb.scm files identical?
>