pcb

  1. Bug #1771726
  2. Comment #10

Comment 10 for bug 1771726

Revision history for this message
Roland Lutz (rlutz) wrote :

> Here is the correct attachment.

The files are identical, just differently named.

> The scm files are different. Please see second attachment.

I have run both versions of gnet-gsch2pcb.scm on your example schematic and got the same output:

    ...
    PKG_JUMPER1.fp(JUMPER1.fp,CONN1,unknown)
    PKG_JUMPER1.fp(JUMPER1.fp,CONN2,unknown)
    PKG_DIODE_LAY(DIODE_LAY-300.fp,D1,unknown,300.fp)
    ...

> gsch2pcb from the fedora repository did not fail in this way

Could you please provide me with the correct output from the Fedora gsch2pcb?