Log in / Register
Oxide
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1654656
Comment #1
Comment 1 for bug 1654656
Revision history for this message
Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)
wrote
on 2017-01-06
:
#1
This is basically a result of std::atomic not being a POD type with GCC 4.8
This is basically a result of std::atomic not being a POD type with GCC 4.8
This is basically a result of std::atomic not being a POD type with GCC 4.8