I see how this could be misleading. Instead of removing completely, since this is a "best practices" doc, how about I rephrase as a reminder about how malicious images can be spread to other users (independently of this exploit) ... or do you think that's already clear from our current documentation? (I don't have a problem with removing it completely.)
Also, is it worth reminding operators about image deactivation?
@Erno #39:
I see how this could be misleading. Instead of removing completely, since this is a "best practices" doc, how about I rephrase as a reminder about how malicious images can be spread to other users (independently of this exploit) ... or do you think that's already clear from our current documentation? (I don't have a problem with removing it completely.)
Also, is it worth reminding operators about image deactivation?