On 02/10/13 21:20, Andrew McDonnell wrote:
> Aside, having multiple cursor type objects gets very confusing with
> debugging after a while
>
> i.e. open_query::oqgraph_cursor vs. oqgraph3::cursor classes
>
> once we get merged into 10.0 I think I will look at refactoring some of
> that with a different naming convention for the 'cursor' objects that
> walk the graph rather than map onto the database - maybe 'walker' ??
Agreed.
The term 'cursor' is already used in SQL context anyway, so best to use
different terms for different code in the server, to avoid confusion.
Regards,
Arjen.
--
Arjen Lentz, Exec.Director @ Open Query (http://openquery.com.au)
Australian peace of mind for your MySQL/MariaDB infrastructure.
Hi Andrew
On 02/10/13 21:20, Andrew McDonnell wrote: :oqgraph_ cursor vs. oqgraph3::cursor classes
> Aside, having multiple cursor type objects gets very confusing with
> debugging after a while
>
> i.e. open_query:
>
> once we get merged into 10.0 I think I will look at refactoring some of
> that with a different naming convention for the 'cursor' objects that
> walk the graph rather than map onto the database - maybe 'walker' ??
Agreed.
The term 'cursor' is already used in SQL context anyway, so best to use
different terms for different code in the server, to avoid confusion.
Regards, openquery. com.au)
Arjen.
--
Arjen Lentz, Exec.Director @ Open Query (http://
Australian peace of mind for your MySQL/MariaDB infrastructure.
Follow us http:// openquery. com.au/ blog/ & http:// twitter. com/openquery