Comment 1 for bug 404640

Revision history for this message
jeff.apple (jeff-apple) wrote :

To the points above:
1) Done.
2) It's messy but works, so I'm going to leave it. The code does cut the timout value by half, so the wait time is right after all.
3) I looked at this wrong. It's OK as it stands.
4) Done.
5) Done.