Just a thought. If someone is doing a time-lapse, it's much more efficient to use the "Image Sequence" feature. It can go 1/60 of a second if needed, and is very simple to do, rather than adding each picture individually. As long as the images are named sequentially, such as "Image001.jpg", "Image002.jpg", etc...
Just a thought. If someone is doing a time-lapse, it's much more efficient to use the "Image Sequence" feature. It can go 1/60 of a second if needed, and is very simple to do, rather than adding each picture individually. As long as the images are named sequentially, such as "Image001.jpg", "Image002.jpg", etc...