Agreed, at least one of the possibilities outlined would keep bug 1664931 fixed as well as mostly addressing the regression covered by this new bug report, which is why I noted it as only a _possible_ need to document an unfixable vulnerability (i.e., if the decision ends up being to revert the CVE-2017-16239 patches instead).
Agreed, at least one of the possibilities outlined would keep bug 1664931 fixed as well as mostly addressing the regression covered by this new bug report, which is why I noted it as only a _possible_ need to document an unfixable vulnerability (i.e., if the decision ends up being to revert the CVE-2017-16239 patches instead).