The proposed patch for Juno doesn't catch 0.0.0.0/00...
Also, we are concerned about this behavior change for Juno, can the same patch logic be used within the validate function (e.g. deflate /0 address into two /1), wouldn't that work and be transparent for Juno users ?
The proposed patch for Juno doesn't catch 0.0.0.0/00...
Also, we are concerned about this behavior change for Juno, can the same patch logic be used within the validate function (e.g. deflate /0 address into two /1), wouldn't that work and be transparent for Juno users ?