Comment 10 for bug 1639186
Revision history for this message
| Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote | #10 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
513534c
demo site
(Get the code!)
@Luis: thanks for your feedback. You did nothing wrong, I only cautiously blocked the patch, for fear or accidental merge :)
I understand both the root cause and the use case we're discussing here. As for QoS capabilities in 2.6, my suggestion would be to reach out to the OVS/OVN community, if you have not done so already, to fully appreciate how to realize the use case.
Falling back on veth pairs would create another variable in the test matrix and it means giving up to security groups as provided by OVS firewall. I'd rather not go down that path, we should not work around existing limitations of the OVS platform. That has been costly in the past, and we should have learned our lesson by now.