Log in / Register
neutron
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1309195
Comment #8
Comment 8 for bug 1309195
Revision history for this message
Grant Murphy (gmurphy)
wrote
on 2014-06-02
:
Re: IPv6 prefix shouldn't be added in the NAT table
#8
Impact description looks ok to me. Maybe don't include the note until issuing the advisory?
Impact description looks ok to me. Maybe don't include the note until issuing the advisory?
Impact description looks ok to me. Maybe don't include the note until issuing the advisory?