So I looked through the code and did some tests and I think the actual word wrapping is behaving as intended, unlike in bug #277133. The issue is a bit finer here in that we should actually be resizing the space alloted to the text based on it's length. So if you need a few more characters then the column width should be expanded to allow it rather than forcing the char wrap.
So I looked through the code and did some tests and I think the actual word wrapping is behaving as intended, unlike in bug #277133. The issue is a bit finer here in that we should actually be resizing the space alloted to the text based on it's length. So if you need a few more characters then the column width should be expanded to allow it rather than forcing the char wrap.