On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Matteo Collina <email address hidden>wrote:
>
> Our approach is mixed: we keep an in-memory data-structure with the list of
> the 'offline' clients, then we store only the packets on disk.
Yeah, that's the architecture I'd very much like to see in Mosquitto.
Currently the on-disk persistence feature caters for data safety, which is
nice.
But the memory usage increases too much for environments where memory is
scarce.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Matteo Collina <email address hidden>wrote:
>
> Our approach is mixed: we keep an in-memory data-structure with the list of
> the 'offline' clients, then we store only the packets on disk.
Yeah, that's the architecture I'd very much like to see in Mosquitto.
Currently the on-disk persistence feature caters for data safety, which is
nice.
But the memory usage increases too much for environments where memory is
scarce.