Comment 19 for bug 990992
Revision history for this message
| RJ Skerry-Ryan (rryan) wrote Re: The new controller polling frequency is too high for desktop systems | #19 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
513534c
demo site
(Get the code!)
There are other parts of Mixxx that we use a 1ms timer, for example in the script-engine scratch timers.
@juliusvonkohout we are searching for the right fix. "just reverting it" doesn't give us any useful information about how to avoid issues like this in the future. High-frequency timers are a very necessary part of getting rid of latency in Mixxx and making it more responsive.
@Bill -- we must be missing something... if RtMidi sleeps for 1ms when no input is available then we are sleeping strictly /more/ often than RtMidi (we sleep 1ms regardless of whether input is available) so where is the difference?