I'm not sure how to fix this in the best way. The issue is, as far as I can tell, that there is nowhere in the model/code that the new g-g-H interaction contains, in fact, a strong coupling squared. It's always simply labelled as a new order 'QNP', but not that 'QNP=QCD^2*QED'. Hence, the code doesn't know that in the QCD running, it should include two extra powers of alpha_S coming from QNP as compared to what is expected from the QCD power alone.
I guess the cleanest way would be to fix this directly in the model. But since I'm not familiar with UFO, I do not know if this feature exists and how madgraph treats it in NLO processes.
Hi Olivier,
I'm not sure how to fix this in the best way. The issue is, as far as I can tell, that there is nowhere in the model/code that the new g-g-H interaction contains, in fact, a strong coupling squared. It's always simply labelled as a new order 'QNP', but not that 'QNP=QCD^2*QED'. Hence, the code doesn't know that in the QCD running, it should include two extra powers of alpha_S coming from QNP as compared to what is expected from the QCD power alone.
I guess the cleanest way would be to fix this directly in the model. But since I'm not familiar with UFO, I do not know if this feature exists and how madgraph treats it in NLO processes.
Rikkert