On 2013-02-26 6:25, Martin Pool wrote:
> John, do you have any opinion on whether we should prefer
> simplejson or json?
>
> I would tend to prefer using the standard library one. I don't
> know if there are any substantial performance or robustness
> differences.
In python 2.6 there are reasons to prefer simplejson (no C
accelerator), however I don't think it is worth worrying about rather
than just using whatever is available.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-02-26 6:25, Martin Pool wrote:
> John, do you have any opinion on whether we should prefer
> simplejson or json?
>
> I would tend to prefer using the standard library one. I don't
> know if there are any substantial performance or robustness
> differences.
In python 2.6 there are reasons to prefer simplejson (no C
accelerator), however I don't think it is worth worrying about rather
than just using whatever is available.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- www.enigmail. net/
sSE8ACgkQJdeBCY SNAAMyeQCfUwh6w WTvWQvt7vhiWNyq 3vK5 h/0sELPftQS+ YfUqcPJ2Dg3eX
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAlE
QdwAoK+
=N1je
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----