The "workaround" is to use Digikam, but I don't want to do it - I prefer working with photos as files in suitable file manager. Why not, after all, if there is a "camera:/" protocol, isn't it so?
The "workaround" is to use Digikam, but I don't want to do it - I prefer working with photos as files in suitable file manager. Why not, after all, if there is a "camera:/" protocol, isn't it so?