On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:13 PM, James Westby <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:06:49 -0000, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
>> I wonder if this needs any updates in udd? It shouldn't, but there's a
>> comment in icommon.py:
>>
>>
>> # development releases first for stacking, no etch or earlier as they aren't on
>> # lp
>> lp_distro_releases = {"ubuntu": ["natty", "warty", "hoary", "breezy",
>> "dapper", "edgy", "feisty", "gutsy",
>> "hardy", "intrepid", "jaunty", "karmic",
>> "lucid", "maverick"],
>> "debian": ["squeeze", "lenny", "sid", "experimental"],
>> }
>
> This will need changing. However, it's not critical. We don't fiddle
> with stacking or anything.
Ah, cool
> We just want to push "natty" first so that new packages follow the same
> stacking scheme that we maintain with existing packages.
For Debian packages, we want to push to sid first, was the main point.
So the list should have sid at the front.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:13 PM, James Westby <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:06:49 -0000, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
>> I wonder if this needs any updates in udd? It shouldn't, but there's a
>> comment in icommon.py:
>>
>>
>> # development releases first for stacking, no etch or earlier as they aren't on
>> # lp
>> lp_distro_releases = {"ubuntu": ["natty", "warty", "hoary", "breezy",
>> "dapper", "edgy", "feisty", "gutsy",
>> "hardy", "intrepid", "jaunty", "karmic",
>> "lucid", "maverick"],
>> "debian": ["squeeze", "lenny", "sid", "experimental"],
>> }
>
> This will need changing. However, it's not critical. We don't fiddle
> with stacking or anything.
Ah, cool
> We just want to push "natty" first so that new packages follow the same
> stacking scheme that we maintain with existing packages.
For Debian packages, we want to push to sid first, was the main point.
So the list should have sid at the front.
-Rob