On 09/11/11 19:44, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
> <email address hidden> wrote:
>> (about openobject-addons)
>> then all the branches which are not against trunk-addons are wasting ~130MB of space on launchpad. There are about 1300 branches against addons, let's hope half of them are against trunk addons (blessed addons), instead of uncertified/community extra addons. Which means that rough guestimate 70GB are wasted by openobject-addons.
>>
>> The worst bit ofcourse is me uploading 130MB for one-liner commits on a
>> dodgy 3G / small-isdn line.
>>
>> Also any project that has activly developed / heavily diverged series is
>> suffering from this.
>
> Is trunk-addons a fork, or a separate codebase?
>
These have common history, and long histories after release (v5.0 is a
couple of years old and is still somewhat maintained, v6.0 released in
february and very actively maintained, v6.1 is "imminent" release)
But the two sets have no common history in between themselves.
(sometimes subdirs are "promoted" from SET-2 into SET-1 with `bzr rm' on
one branch, `cp' and `bzr add' on the other side)
As far as I know it used to be a one massive svn repository.
--
With best regards,
Dmitrijs Ledkovs
credativ ltd Tel: 01788 298152
36 Regent Street Fax: 01788 298159
Rugby CV21 2PS - UK http://www.credativ.co.uk
credativ Ltd is registered in England & Wales, company no. 5261743
Registered office: Nelson House, 2 Hamilton Terrace, Leamington Spa,
Warwickshire CV32 4LY
Certified by AccredIT UK with the ICT Supply standard of quality for
Software Product Design and Development
On 09/11/11 19:44, Robert Collins wrote: community extra addons. Which means that rough guestimate 70GB are wasted by openobject-addons.
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
> <email address hidden> wrote:
>> (about openobject-addons)
>> then all the branches which are not against trunk-addons are wasting ~130MB of space on launchpad. There are about 1300 branches against addons, let's hope half of them are against trunk addons (blessed addons), instead of uncertified/
>>
>> The worst bit ofcourse is me uploading 130MB for one-liner commits on a
>> dodgy 3G / small-isdn line.
>>
>> Also any project that has activly developed / heavily diverged series is
>> suffering from this.
>
> Is trunk-addons a fork, or a separate codebase?
>
These have common history, and long histories after release (v5.0 is a
couple of years old and is still somewhat maintained, v6.0 released in
february and very actively maintained, v6.1 is "imminent" release)
$ bzr missing -d lp:openobject-addons/5.0 lp:openobject-addons
You have 328 extra revision(s)
$ bzr missing -d lp:openobject-addons/6.0 lp:openobject-addons
You have 347 extra revision(s)
$ bzr missing -d lp:openobject-addons/extra-trunk lp:openobject-addons
You have 1643 extra revision(s)
You are missing 5487 revision(s)
SET 1:
lp:opneobject-addons
lp:opneobject-addons/5.0
lp:opneobject-addons/6.0
- have common history
SET 2:
lp:opneobject-addons/extra-trunk
lp:opneobject-addons/extra-5.0
lp:opneobject-addons/extra-6.0
- have common history
But the two sets have no common history in between themselves.
(sometimes subdirs are "promoted" from SET-2 into SET-1 with `bzr rm' on
one branch, `cp' and `bzr add' on the other side)
As far as I know it used to be a one massive svn repository.
--
With best regards,
Dmitrijs Ledkovs
credativ ltd Tel: 01788 298152 www.credativ. co.uk
36 Regent Street Fax: 01788 298159
Rugby CV21 2PS - UK http://
credativ Ltd is registered in England & Wales, company no. 5261743
Registered office: Nelson House, 2 Hamilton Terrace, Leamington Spa,
Warwickshire CV32 4LY
Certified by AccredIT UK with the ICT Supply standard of quality for
Software Product Design and Development