I think the bug is asking that they be sorted by expected completion date, which sounds reasonable to me.
Alternatively you could sort by a version-number-sorting algorithm (e.g. 0.8.1 < 0.9)
I think the bug is asking that they be sorted by expected completion date, which sounds reasonable to me.
Alternatively you could sort by a version- number- sorting algorithm (e.g. 0.8.1 < 0.9)