On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 03:47 +0000, Martin Albisetti wrote:
> Actually, it should subscribe the reviewer by default. There's a bug
> about that around somewhere which I can't find.
What if it does, but all the branches from before reviews don't ave it
subscribed?
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 03:47 +0000, Martin Albisetti wrote:
> Actually, it should subscribe the reviewer by default. There's a bug
> about that around somewhere which I can't find.
What if it does, but all the branches from before reviews don't ave it
subscribed?