Comment 1 for bug 372534

Revision history for this message
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) wrote :

Hm, interesting idea. The rationale for sorting by importance was that it would be more useful for actual developers -- the top reports would be the ones they'd need to work on next. But as you say, it's not so relevant for reporters or subscribers.

So perhaps the +assignedbugs list should be sorted by importance by default, while all the other person bugs lists are sorted most-recently-changed first as you suggest.