Hm, interesting idea. The rationale for sorting by importance was that it would be more useful for actual developers -- the top reports would be the ones they'd need to work on next. But as you say, it's not so relevant for reporters or subscribers.
So perhaps the +assignedbugs list should be sorted by importance by default, while all the other person bugs lists are sorted most-recently-changed first as you suggest.
Hm, interesting idea. The rationale for sorting by importance was that it would be more useful for actual developers -- the top reports would be the ones they'd need to work on next. But as you say, it's not so relevant for reporters or subscribers.
So perhaps the +assignedbugs list should be sorted by importance by default, while all the other person bugs lists are sorted most-recently- changed first as you suggest.