On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 16:37 +0000, Curtis Hovey wrote:
> If this is not addresses in 2.2.4, this will be marked low importance.
I'm a little concerned at the implication that the longer a bug has been
outstanding, the less relevant it is. This bug is still an issue, and
the importance still stands.
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 16:37 +0000, Curtis Hovey wrote:
> If this is not addresses in 2.2.4, this will be marked low importance.
I'm a little concerned at the implication that the longer a bug has been
outstanding, the less relevant it is. This bug is still an issue, and
the importance still stands.