On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:58:09AM -0000, Julian Edwards wrote:
> Stuart says:
> > latest and greatest bzr from the bzr PPA is not useful to them until
> > a compatible bzrtools package is released.
>
> This is a packaging issue, no amount of trickery on the part of PPAs
> will solve this.
Really? I had thought that if we did indeed offer a configurable number
of packages to be kept around, the bzr problem would indeed be fixed
without the need for multiple PPAs. Can you elaborate?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:58:09AM -0000, Julian Edwards wrote:
> Stuart says:
> > latest and greatest bzr from the bzr PPA is not useful to them until
> > a compatible bzrtools package is released.
>
> This is a packaging issue, no amount of trickery on the part of PPAs
> will solve this.
Really? I had thought that if we did indeed offer a configurable number
of packages to be kept around, the bzr problem would indeed be fixed
without the need for multiple PPAs. Can you elaborate?