On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Jonathan Lange <email address hidden> wrote:
> OK, so you agree it's a bug :)
Yes!
Let's fix it...
> The listing is showing branches that:
> - are linked to series
> - are neither merged nor abandoned
> - have been changed recently
> - and are in the top N of these (my guess is ~70)
We should show the grouping by projects more clearly, because of the
way the URLs are constructed, it isn't obvious.
One thing I can think of, is that we could bring ajax into the
picture, and show branches with the project name as a title, the "top
5 more relevant branches", and allow them to be expanded, and the list
can be fetched with ajax.
How does this per-project view sound?
My guess is that people really think in terms of projects.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Jonathan Lange <email address hidden> wrote:
> OK, so you agree it's a bug :)
Yes!
Let's fix it...
> The listing is showing branches that:
> - are linked to series
> - are neither merged nor abandoned
> - have been changed recently
> - and are in the top N of these (my guess is ~70)
We should show the grouping by projects more clearly, because of the
way the URLs are constructed, it isn't obvious.
One thing I can think of, is that we could bring ajax into the
picture, and show branches with the project name as a title, the "top
5 more relevant branches", and allow them to be expanded, and the list
can be fetched with ajax.
How does this per-project view sound?
My guess is that people really think in terms of projects.