On Thursday 18 June 2009 10:34:44 Graham Binns wrote: > The hidden fields thing is probably the easiest way to do this, though > it feels kinda hackish.
It's not hackish at all IMO, it's a pretty standard way of working with stateless clients.
On Thursday 18 June 2009 10:34:44 Graham Binns wrote:
> The hidden fields thing is probably the easiest way to do this, though
> it feels kinda hackish.
It's not hackish at all IMO, it's a pretty standard way of working with
stateless clients.