Could be recommends at the very best, but even that does not quite fit the situation...
From Debian Policy:
> Recommends
>
> This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.
>
> The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together with this one in all but unusual installations.
Since my systems have k-d-t but not u-d-t I can not get myself to consider recommends a sensible relation. Suggests is the only one left, and it's definition fits the case at hand quite well:
> Suggests
>
> This is used to declare that one package may be more useful with one or more others.
> Using this field tells the packaging system and the user that the listed packages are related
> to this one and can perhaps enhance its usefulness, but that installing this one without them
> is perfectly reasonable.
Then again what's the use since suggests does not install udt anyway, which is what is requested. Thoughts?
Could be recommends at the very best, but even that does not quite fit the situation...
From Debian Policy:
> Recommends
>
> This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.
>
> The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together with this one in all but unusual installations.
Since my systems have k-d-t but not u-d-t I can not get myself to consider recommends a sensible relation. Suggests is the only one left, and it's definition fits the case at hand quite well:
> Suggests
>
> This is used to declare that one package may be more useful with one or more others.
> Using this field tells the packaging system and the user that the listed packages are related
> to this one and can perhaps enhance its usefulness, but that installing this one without them
> is perfectly reasonable.
Then again what's the use since suggests does not install udt anyway, which is what is requested. Thoughts?