Splitting REMOTE_USER by '@' and discarding anything strikes me as a non-existent use case to begin with (this just looks broken). If there is no use case for this behavior, this bug is effectively embargoed from a non-existent set of users. I'm working to corroborate or contradict this suspicion if possible.
Splitting REMOTE_USER by '@' and discarding anything strikes me as a non-existent use case to begin with (this just looks broken). If there is no use case for this behavior, this bug is effectively embargoed from a non-existent set of users. I'm working to corroborate or contradict this suspicion if possible.