If confirmed, it's in the "extension of validity" class like the ones where you could extend the lifetime of a token. A bit hard to exploit (since you need to be given the role in the first place) but definitely needs to be fixed. I would issue an OSSA on this for the same reason we issued one on the previous token issues.
If confirmed, it's in the "extension of validity" class like the ones where you could extend the lifetime of a token. A bit hard to exploit (since you need to be given the role in the first place) but definitely needs to be fixed. I would issue an OSSA on this for the same reason we issued one on the previous token issues.