Comment #3 : Bug #1590960 : Bugs : Canonical Juju

Comment 3 for bug 1590960

Revision history for this message
Nate Finch (natefinch) wrote :

Curtis said that deploying to a container via a bundle still works, and juju add-machine lxd works (creates a machine with an lxd container on it). And I can then deploy --to 0/lxd/0 ... so it's only the straight deploy --to lxd that seems to be broken, as far as I can tell.