Hello and thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
I read the discussion above and would like to clarify a few things:
1) Does the segfault happen with the dnsmasq package from Lunar/Mantic? I see tasks for both systems added to this bug (and the Mantic one is set as Confirmed), but it's not clear from the messages above whether the failure really happens there.
2) Assuming that the segfault does *not* happen in Lunar/Mantic, I can prepare a PPA with the backported patch from upstream and ask you to test it.
3) If the failure *does* happen in Lunar/Mantic, we will need to investigate it further.
FWIW, Kinetic has reached its end of standard support so I will set its task as Won't Fix.
Hello and thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
I read the discussion above and would like to clarify a few things:
1) Does the segfault happen with the dnsmasq package from Lunar/Mantic? I see tasks for both systems added to this bug (and the Mantic one is set as Confirmed), but it's not clear from the messages above whether the failure really happens there.
2) Assuming that the segfault does *not* happen in Lunar/Mantic, I can prepare a PPA with the backported patch from upstream and ask you to test it.
3) If the failure *does* happen in Lunar/Mantic, we will need to investigate it further.
FWIW, Kinetic has reached its end of standard support so I will set its task as Won't Fix.
Thank you.