Comment 40 for bug 1373221

Paulo Assis:
> For applications I would definitely adopt some sort of rolling
> release, but for core stuff (kernel, desktop manager, core libs) I
> think a timed release is probably better, as it would help keep the
> system more stable.
> I don't think keeping a broken app for 6 months, just because that's
> the version available in debian at the time of release, is a very good
> policy, specially if a fixed version is already available.

Then I see that I'm not the only one who thought it: that software
releasing need different approaches depending on how much
interdependency there is.

Okay: so than you for your insight. I think that you have managed this
bug very diligently :-)