Just popped in to check on this bug. I don't have the hardware I filed this against anymore, and I'm still happy on OS X and my Macbook Air, but I feel a responsibility to the users still stuck with this problem.
Why are you guys marking the g-p-m bug invalid? The switch to g-s-d doesn't invalidate the original bug, which was logged against a still-supported LTS version. 10.04 still uses g-p-m. By all means, open a new bug for the new g-s-d incarnation of the bug, but please don't hose the LTS users...
Just popped in to check on this bug. I don't have the hardware I filed this against anymore, and I'm still happy on OS X and my Macbook Air, but I feel a responsibility to the users still stuck with this problem.
Why are you guys marking the g-p-m bug invalid? The switch to g-s-d doesn't invalidate the original bug, which was logged against a still-supported LTS version. 10.04 still uses g-p-m. By all means, open a new bug for the new g-s-d incarnation of the bug, but please don't hose the LTS users...