Again, thank you very much for the followup. Keep up the excellent work!
-David
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Pedro Villavicencio <email address hidden>wrote:
> Any news? did you opened a bug upstream? may you tell us the bug number?
> thanks.
>
> --
> gnome-panel: main menu: arrow icon blemish
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291463
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "gnome-panel" source package in Ubuntu: New
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: gnome-panel
>
> I believe this was submitted before for hardy.
>
> The issue is that, with gnome-panel when the "main menu" applet is used,
> there is a small arrow that shows on the panel, creating a visual blemish
> with whatever themed menu icon people use.
>
> the line in: gnome-panel/panel-menu-button.c
> could just be modified to read
>
> "has-arrow", FALSE,
> instead of:
> "has-arrow", TRUE,
>
> btw what is the reason for having the arrow there?
>
Thanks for the follow-up. That encouraged me to actually file it. When bugzilla. gnome.org/ show_bug. cgi?id= 562247>
you're working, sometimes things are left behind. the bug number is:
Bug #562247 <http://
Again, thank you very much for the followup. Keep up the excellent work!
-David
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Pedro Villavicencio <email address hidden>wrote:
> Any news? did you opened a bug upstream? may you tell us the bug number? /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 291463 panel-menu- button. c
> thanks.
>
> --
> gnome-panel: main menu: arrow icon blemish
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "gnome-panel" source package in Ubuntu: New
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: gnome-panel
>
> I believe this was submitted before for hardy.
>
> The issue is that, with gnome-panel when the "main menu" applet is used,
> there is a small arrow that shows on the panel, creating a visual blemish
> with whatever themed menu icon people use.
>
> the line in: gnome-panel/
> could just be modified to read
>
> "has-arrow", FALSE,
> instead of:
> "has-arrow", TRUE,
>
> btw what is the reason for having the arrow there?
>
--
-David Bryson