What are your feelings about libdrizzle being stable?
On Feb 20, 2013, at 21:35, Keyur <email address hidden> wrote:
> I see that the query_escape API signature differs between
> libdrizzle-5.1.3 and the one in the libdrizzle in drizzle-7.1.36. I
> haven't compared the other methods yet.
>
> Is libdrizzle-5.1.13 considered a stable release now? This is pretty
> much the only reason we haven't upgraded yet...
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1130515
>
> Title:
> Too much memory allocated for drizzle query
>
> Status in Gearman Server and Client Libraries:
> In Progress
>
> Bug description:
> Typo in the drizzle queue escape-query code where it reserves
> (query_length * query_length/2) bytes. This obviously gets too heavy
> when the payload is large :)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/gearmand/+bug/1130515/+subscriptions
What are your feelings about libdrizzle being stable?
On Feb 20, 2013, at 21:35, Keyur <email address hidden> wrote:
> I see that the query_escape API signature differs between /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1130515 /bugs.launchpad .net/gearmand/ +bug/1130515/ +subscriptions
> libdrizzle-5.1.3 and the one in the libdrizzle in drizzle-7.1.36. I
> haven't compared the other methods yet.
>
> Is libdrizzle-5.1.13 considered a stable release now? This is pretty
> much the only reason we haven't upgraded yet...
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Too much memory allocated for drizzle query
>
> Status in Gearman Server and Client Libraries:
> In Progress
>
> Bug description:
> Typo in the drizzle queue escape-query code where it reserves
> (query_length * query_length/2) bytes. This obviously gets too heavy
> when the payload is large :)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/