Andrey: the patch you've mentioned provides a sensible d_name for internal tmpfs (which implements sys V shared memory).
> Nobody was good in a guessing.
That's not exactly correct:
> many synthetic filesystems (anonpipefs, sockfs, inotifyfd, eventfd, signalfd, internal tmpfs which implements sys V
> shared memory, you name it) have no mount point (so they qualify as a "global root"), and their root dentries might
> have no sensible names.
Apparently this hypothesis is correct (and the trace is harmless and can be ignored)
Andrey: the patch you've mentioned provides a sensible d_name for internal tmpfs (which implements sys V shared memory).
> Nobody was good in a guessing.
That's not exactly correct:
> many synthetic filesystems (anonpipefs, sockfs, inotifyfd, eventfd, signalfd, internal tmpfs which implements sys V
> shared memory, you name it) have no mount point (so they qualify as a "global root"), and their root dentries might
> have no sensible names.
Apparently this hypothesis is correct (and the trace is harmless and can be ignored)