Comment 16 for bug 1494804

Revision history for this message
Thomas A. F. Thorne (tafthorne) wrote :

Not so easily it seems.

$ sudo aptitude install libaccounts-glib0-dbgsym evolution-data-server-online-accounts-dbgsym libglib2.0-0-dbgsym
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  evolution-data-server-online-accounts-dbgsym{b} libaccounts-glib0-dbgsym libglib2.0-0-dbgsym{b}
0 packages upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 8 not upgraded.
Need to get 96.7 kB of archives. After unpacking 414 kB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 evolution-data-server-online-accounts-dbgsym : Depends: evolution-data-server-dbg (= 3.10.4-0ubuntu1) but it is not going to be installed.
 libglib2.0-0-dbgsym : Depends: libglib2.0-0-dbg (= 2.40.0-2) but it is not going to be installed.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

     Keep the following packages at their current version:
1) evolution-data-server-online-accounts-dbgsym [Not Installed]
2) libglib2.0-0-dbgsym [Not Installed]

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] n
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

      Remove the following packages:
1) libelfg0
2) libglib2.0-bin

      Install the following packages:
3) evolution-data-server-dbg [3.10.4-0ubuntu1 (trusty)]
4) libelfg0:i386 [0.8.13-4~1 (raring)]
5) libglib2.0-0-dbg [2.40.0-2 (trusty)]
6) libglib2.0-bin:i386 [2.40.0-2 (trusty)]

      Downgrade the following packages:
7) evolution-data-server [3.10.4-0ubuntu1.5 (now, trusty-updates) -> 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 (trusty)]
8) evolution-data-server-common [3.10.4-0ubuntu1.5 (now, trusty-updates) -> 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 (trus
9) evolution-data-server-online-accounts [3.10.4-0ubuntu1.5 (now, trusty-updates) -> 3.10.4-0ubun
10) libcamel-1.2-45 [3.10.4-0ubuntu1.5 (now, trusty-updates) -> 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 (trusty)]
11) libglib2.0-0 [2.40.2-0ubuntu1 (now, trusty-updates) -> 2.40.0-2 (trusty)]
12) libglib2.0-0:i386 [2.40.2-0ubuntu1 (now, trusty-updates) -> 2.40.0-2 (trusty)]

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]

Would something like the suggested set of downgrades be acceptable or would it change too much that possibly relates to the issue.