Comment 26 for bug 1198465

My branch isn't complete yet, but it's progressing well. I should have something push-able by tomorrow.

FWIW, I chatted with Ben earlier today, and bounced the following table names off him (the interface might not follow these names *exactly*, but they should be kept as close as possible): fine_reversal, reversal_payment, account_adjustment, adjustment_payment. I was partial to fine_reversal, but Ben liked the "adjustment" names better. I am running with "adjustment_payment" for the table name (for now), but would be happy with a "reversal" name as well (it is less generic, which can be seen as either good or bad depending on how many cases we want this type to cover).