Comment 2 for bug 541180

Revision history for this message
Andrew Johnson (anj) wrote :

Wouldn't this prevent the passing of extra-enum values, which are currently supported and supplied by the database?

The mbbi record type sets VAL to 65535 if it can't find a match for RVAL in the ??VL fields, and if none of the ??VL or ??ST fields are set it copies RVAL directly into VAL. I know that Dirk Zimoch relies on this behavior.