© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
513534c
demo site
(Get the code!)
Wouldn't this prevent the passing of extra-enum values, which are currently supported and supplied by the database?
The mbbi record type sets VAL to 65535 if it can't find a match for RVAL in the ??VL fields, and if none of the ??VL or ??ST fields are set it copies RVAL directly into VAL. I know that Dirk Zimoch relies on this behavior.