Oh, right. I'm sorry that the comment I made is not posted successfully.
In terms of the "bug description", there are some common parts in these bugs reported before (see bug 1028532, bug 1439825 and bug 1001933). We do not have such a problem and there are no other users affected by this issue. Attached is my test for ecryptfs-recover-private. But marking this as "invalid" is inappropriate, I think. So I'm going to ask @Karl-Philipp Richter. Do you have any information related to this bug in your log? Can you post what information on your console after you enter "sudo ecryptfs-recover-private --rw /mnt/bla/.Private " ?
Oh, right. I'm sorry that the comment I made is not posted successfully.
In terms of the "bug description", there are some common parts in these bugs reported before (see bug 1028532, bug 1439825 and bug 1001933). We do not have such a problem and there are no other users affected by this issue. Attached is my test for ecryptfs- recover- private. But marking this as "invalid" is inappropriate, I think. So I'm going to ask @Karl-Philipp Richter. Do you have any information related to this bug in your log? Can you post what information on your console after you enter "sudo ecryptfs- recover- private --rw /mnt/bla/.Private " ?