Comment 7 for bug 484069
Revision history for this message
| Jay Pipes (jaypipes) wrote Re: [Bug 484069] Re: auth_pam not working | #7 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
513534c
demo site
(Get the code!)
No problem, and reading through the PAM configuration, it actually
recommends a single name, not exactly the same as the program name.
So...what would you prefer? drizzled-pam? drizzled_auth? something else?
Go ahead and name it :)
-jay
Diego E. Flameeyes Pettenò wrote:
> I would sincerely prefer if we were to decided a single service name for
> all the distributions; having it configurable, and then have all the
> distributions to do in a different way, is neither nice to the users
> (guides don't apply) nor to the developers (debugging).
>