If we think that the details aren't important then we can design a filesystem which leads to fragmentation like a famous shopkeeper of Redmond, just because we think that isn't important to write the new files to a place were it could have place to be extended.
I think that each detail is important. Each energy source (nuke, coal, gaz, oil, wind, water, solar cell, solar thermic facility, plants oil, ...) has a drawback (nuclear wastes/risk, carbon dioxide, cost/space, seisms, chemical wastes, used space, energy/food competition, ...). We have to lower the energy consumption when it is easy.
When I'm using Microsoft Word, it opens just in one click. When I'm using Open Office, I have the time to take a coffee before it is launched, even we the (not so) quick start.
If we think that the details aren't important then we can design a filesystem which leads to fragmentation like a famous shopkeeper of Redmond, just because we think that isn't important to write the new files to a place were it could have place to be extended.
I think that each detail is important. Each energy source (nuke, coal, gaz, oil, wind, water, solar cell, solar thermic facility, plants oil, ...) has a drawback (nuclear wastes/risk, carbon dioxide, cost/space, seisms, chemical wastes, used space, energy/food competition, ...). We have to lower the energy consumption when it is easy.
When I'm using Microsoft Word, it opens just in one click. When I'm using Open Office, I have the time to take a coffee before it is launched, even we the (not so) quick start.