Comment 30 for bug 1995274

(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #27)
> But this also handles DW_FORM_rnglistx and DW_FORM_loclistx.
> Shouldn't setup_cu_bases also handle these?

And that is what patch4 does.

> And if so, should we have an skip_Form_contents function that can be used in
> both places?

Still a good idea, but not super urgent.

Found once small issue with patch4:

+ case DW_FORM_rnglistx:
+ case DW_FORM_loclistx:
+ return VARSZ_FORM;
+ return VARSZ_FORM;

Removed the duplicate return and pushed as:

commit d19bbdf1200685ddbb6976cf915fba25f2097162
Author: Luboš Luňák <email address hidden>
Date: Tue Apr 19 12:20:16 2022 +0200

    read dwarf5 DW_FORM_rnglistx and DW_FORM_loclistx

    The .debug_rnglists/.debug_loclists sections first have a list of offsets
    and then a list of the actual data that those offsets point to.