Comment 32 for bug 1573594

Revision history for this message
Eric Desrochers (slashd) wrote :

Ionna,

Let's then request the SRU verification team to drop the package for trusty-proposed.
If SASL is not supported in the Trusty pkg, there is no point to complete the SRU for Trusty.

Additionally, since Trusty is near to its EOL, I don't see good reason/justification to justify the effort/work to enable SASL on the package.

Also enabling SASL, IMHO, won't be consider a "bug fix", but a "new feature".

For all the reasons above, let's simply drop the pkg from trusty-proposed.

- Eric