> (I suspect you know this, but it's kind of hard to find because it's
> been renamed and switched packages: you should now use /bin/running-in-
> container which ships with upstart)
I did not know this. you probably should lay down a symlink or some other
way handle backward compatibility.
However, the actually "i don't have lxc-is-container" code is busted also.
It was expecting to find only a "/" in the cgroup file that it opened.
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> (I suspect you know this, but it's kind of hard to find because it's
> been renamed and switched packages: you should now use /bin/running-in-
> container which ships with upstart)
I did not know this. you probably should lay down a symlink or some other
way handle backward compatibility.
However, the actually "i don't have lxc-is-container" code is busted also.
It was expecting to find only a "/" in the cgroup file that it opened.