Juan,
I think the problem is that the properties shouldn't be managed as regular fields. Why can't glance V2 API continue to treat the properties the way the glance V1 API treated them? Was this an intentional change in the glance V2 API or is it a bug in the glance V2 API?
Bart
Juan,
I think the problem is that the properties shouldn't be managed as regular fields. Why can't glance V2 API continue to treat the properties the way the glance V1 API treated them? Was this an intentional change in the glance V2 API or is it a bug in the glance V2 API?
Bart