Comment 12 for bug 2015090

On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 14:05 +0000, Sahid Orentino wrote:
> Hum... line 33 and 45 of [0] we can see that your networks are not
> attached to any segments. It is not expected that the code go through
> the point that you are mentioning on comment #7, see [1].
>
> anychance that you print network.segments ? In all cases I will check
> the code to understand what's going on...

I applied this change[0] which produced this output [1] (this is a different environment, so the
list/show for network, subnet and segments are [2] in case you need to cross reference the UUIDs)

The network that has associated a segment with the segment_id set to None is of network_type flat:

network: 9eb0c107-fc1b-494b-922a-645c2f728fc3
segment: hosts=['juju-aae23a-jammy-antelope-8.project.serverstack',
                'juju-aae23a-jammy-antelope-9.project.serverstack'],
         id=9fa37738-1cd1-48bf-8d2b-426bd65216f6,
         is_dynamic=False,
         name=None,
         network_id=9eb0c107-fc1b-494b-922a-645c2f728fc3,
         network_type=flat,
         physical_network=physnet1,
         segment_index=0,
         segmentation_id=None

[0] https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/qRWwZFwcpH/
[1] https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/hdRZmjDFvs/
[2] https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/VCmBfyZyRk/