Comment 16 for bug 1939389

My pleasure! :)

That particular bit of code, should not be hit, unless you don't have "auth_type" set in the config. The cinder user *should* be privileged I think.

Here is a quick diff of the stuff I posted in comment #9:

https://github.com/gabriel-samfira/charm-cinder/commit/82505257b129db91b1aabeac744e02c900852287

Give this a shot in your env, see if it fixes it. I wrote this a while ago. If the charm template context changed, you may need to adapt it. A relation to keystone should ensure that context exists.