Robert Collins wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> I did a pull of bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-
> pqm/launchpad/devel/ with local revno 10721, up to revno 10876.
>
> This averaged 21KB/s:
> 748.335 Transferred: 15944KiB (21.3K/s r:11110K w:4834K)
>
> This suggests a problem somewhere - we can generate our data much more
> quickly than that. I'll try to get a strace of the worker process and
> some network stats tomorrow.
>
> ** Affects: bzr
> Importance: Critical
> Status: Confirmed
>
>
> ** Tags: network performance udd
>
> ** Tags added: network performance udd
>
I've certainly seen 1MB/s @ Vincent's w/ low latency, while doing a
fresh branch, etc. So the source is capable of doing better.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Collins wrote: //bazaar. launchpad. net/~launchpad- devel/ with local revno 10721, up to revno 10876.
> Public bug reported:
>
> I did a pull of bzr+ssh:
> pqm/launchpad/
>
> This averaged 21KB/s:
> 748.335 Transferred: 15944KiB (21.3K/s r:11110K w:4834K)
>
> This suggests a problem somewhere - we can generate our data much more
> quickly than that. I'll try to get a strace of the worker process and
> some network stats tomorrow.
>
> ** Affects: bzr
> Importance: Critical
> Status: Confirmed
>
>
> ** Tags: network performance udd
>
> ** Tags added: network performance udd
>
I've certainly seen 1MB/s @ Vincent's w/ low latency, while doing a
fresh branch, etc. So the source is capable of doing better.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
y6eIACgkQJdeBCY SNAANyBQCgj1EsD i9xlJy9N/ ZBuztBKI7k MeUdW8W8mjkhoIj hAXWpvc0F
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkv
qogAn1q/
=Wco3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----