On 20 May 2006, John Dong <email address hidden> wrote: > inode number... Yes, that could be used to track renames, but that'd > harm our portability.
It's not so much about portability as that it won't always be reliable.
> Perhaps we should just take out the part about using os mv?
Where is that?
Perhaps the text actually means that you can manipulate *branches* using mv and rm?
-- Martin Pool
On 20 May 2006, John Dong <email address hidden> wrote:
> inode number... Yes, that could be used to track renames, but that'd
> harm our portability.
It's not so much about portability as that it won't always be reliable.
> Perhaps we should just take out the part about using os mv?
Where is that?
Perhaps the text actually means that you can manipulate *branches* using mv
and rm?
--
Martin Pool